.png){kind=small}
The Best Dermal Fillers for Nasolabial Folds (NLF) and Marionette Lines:
Detailed Comparison
Nasolabial folds (NLF) and marionette lines are among the most noticeable signs of chronological aging, often requiring both volumization and structural lifting. The ideal filler for this area must balance a high lifting capacity (G-prime) with the flexibility necessary to integrate naturally into highly dynamic facial areas. This comprehensive guide compares six of the best injectable solutions on the market, including Hyaluronic Acid (HA) fillers from leading brands (Juvederm, Restylane, Revolax, Neuramis, Beufiller) and the primary Collagen Biostimulator (Radiesse), to facilitate the choice of the most effective treatment.
Choosing the Right Tool: Essential Characteristics for NLF Correction
Effective NLF treatment often involves two layers: the deep dermis/subcutis for lifting and the superficial dermis for smoothing. The choice of filler must reflect this necessity.
Fundamental Filler Properties for Nasolabial Folds:
- High Viscosity/G-Prime: Necessary for deep injection, serving to lift the fold from below. Juvederm Voluma and Radiesse excel here.
- Dynamic Integration: The filler’s ability to move and stretch naturally with facial expressions, preventing a rigid or “overfilled” appearance. Fillers like Restylane are preferred for their specific technology.
- Longevity & Collagen Stimulation: Solutions offering long-term results, particularly biostimulators like Radiesse, which work by inducing the body’s own collagen production.
Here is a direct comparison of the six best fillers used by professionals globally for structural support and fold correction.
🏆 Comparison of 6 Leading Fillers for Nasolabial Folds and Marionette Lines
The table below compares injectable fillers, highlighting their properties for treating the perioral area. Note: These are medical-grade treatments and must be administered exclusively by qualified healthcare professionals.
| Feature/Product | Radiesse (CaHA) | Juvederm Voluma | Restylane (Defyne/Refyne) | Neuramis Deep | Revolax Deep | BeuFiller (Mid) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base Ingredient | Calcium Hydroxylapatite (CaHA) | Hyaluronic Acid (HA) | Hyaluronic Acid (HA) | Hyaluronic Acid (HA) | Hyaluronic Acid (HA) | Hyaluronic Acid (HA) |
| NLF Indication | Structural Lift, Deepest Folds | Mid-Face Volumization/NLF Lift | Dynamic Folds (Optimal Flexibility) | Moderate/Deep Folds, High Cohesivity | Deep Folds, Strong Volume, Long Duration | Moderate Folds, Good Integration |
| Average Duration (Est.) | 12 – 18+ Months | 18 – 24 Months (Cheeks) | 12 – 18 Months | 8 – 12 Months | 12 – 18 Months | 9 – 12 Months |
| Key Feature | Collagen Stimulation | High G-Prime/Vycross Tech | XpresHAn Dynamic Tech | SHAPE Technology (High Cohesivity) | Highly Viscous/Longer Duration | Excellent Spreadability/Softness |
| Order | Order Now | Order Now | Order Now | Order Now | Order Now | Order Now |
| NLF Expert Summary: Radiesse or Juvederm Voluma are best suited for lifting the mid-face, indirectly correcting NLF. Restylane Defyne is ideal for dynamic creases. Neuramis Deep and Revolax Deep offer reliable, high-volume HA correction with good longevity. | ||||||
📊 Pros and Cons for NLF and Marionette Lines Application
The following table provides a quick summary of the main advantages and disadvantages of each filler when used to correct folds in the lower third of the face.
| Product | ✅ Pros (NLF/Marionette Advantages) | ❌ Cons (Limitations/Considerations) |
|---|---|---|
| Radiesse (CaHA) | * Superior Structural Lift thanks to CaHA microspheres. Long-term Collagen Stimulation. Very high Duration (12-18+ months). Ideal for use in the deep (pre-periosteal) plane. | * Not HA-based, therefore not dissolvable with Hyaluronidase. Requires a deep and precise injection technique. Less suitable for superficial corrections or fine lines. |
| Juvederm Voluma | * Maximum lifting capacity (G-Prime) among HAs. Excellent for correcting NLF indirectly (by lifting the cheeks). Exceptional longevity (up to 24 months in the target area). Smooth and homogeneous texture (Vycross). | * Not ideal for injection directly into the fold due to its density (risk of visibility). Cost is generally higher. Less flexible than Restylane fillers for dynamic wrinkles. |
| Restylane (Defyne/Refyne) | * XpresHAn Technology for dynamic flexibility. Excellent integration with facial movements (natural result). Defyne is perfect for moderate/deep folds; Refyne for less pronounced folds. Dissolvable with Hyaluronidase. | * Does not offer the same structural lifting capacity as Voluma or Radiesse. May require more volume or more frequent touch-up injections for very deep folds. |
| Neuramis Deep | * High Cohesivity for good shape retention. Cost-effective solution with reliable performance. Ideal for direct filling of moderate/deep folds. Dissolvable (HA). | * Duration (8-12 months) is shorter compared to Voluma or Radiesse. May not offer the same dynamic flexibility as Restylane products. |
| Revolax Deep | * High viscosity for a strong volume effect. Good longevity for an HA filler (up to 18 months). Very effective for contouring and direct lifting of pronounced folds. Dissolvable (HA). | * Its density may make it less suitable for patients seeking a very subtle or superficial correction. High risk if not injected in the correct deep treatment plane. |
| BeuFiller (Mid) | * Excellent softness and spreadability. Natural and discreet result for moderate folds. Optimal tissue integration. Dissolvable (HA). | * Not a structural filler; poor lifting capacity (low G-prime). The duration is among the shortest (9-12 months). Not recommended for very deep NLF folds or mid-face collapse. |
Review: Radiesse (Calcium Hydroxylapatite)
Radiesse stands out as a collagen biostimulator. It provides immediate volume, but its primary benefit is long-term collagen synthesis. When treating the NLF, Radiesse is often used in the deeper, pre-periosteal plane to create a structural lift, addressing the underlying bone and deep tissue loss that causes the fold to deepen. It is the strongest option for longevity and structural correction, lasting 12 to 18+ months. Since it is not HA, it cannot be dissolved with hyaluronidase, which requires a skilled injector. Radiesse is highly recommended for patients with severe, deep NLF caused by significant facial volume collapse.
Review: Juvederm Voluma (Vycross)
While technically designed for the cheek and chin, Juvederm Voluma is crucial for NLF correction when the fold is caused by mid-face volume loss. By injecting Voluma deep into the cheeks, the tissue is lifted, which can significantly soften the NLF indirectly. Voluma utilizes Vycross technology, providing a strong lift (high G-prime) with exceptional smoothness, and it offers one of the longest durations for an HA filler (up to 2 years in the mid-face). Its main use for NLF is strategic, acting as a deep pillar to reverse the sagging process.
Review: Restylane (Dynamic Portfolio)
The Defyne and Refyne products from the Restylane line are exceptional for NLF due to their XpresHAn technology, which allows the HA gel to stretch and recoil like an elastic band. This dynamic flexibility is crucial for the highly mobile mouth area. Restylane Defyne is used for deep to moderate folds needing support, while Refyne is for moderate to fine lines requiring a softer fill. They integrate seamlessly, preventing a rigid look when smiling, making them a top choice for a natural, expressive correction that lasts 12-18 months.
Review: Neuramis Deep
Neuramis Deep, developed with SHAPE technology, is a popular, highly cohesive HA filler often utilized for moderate to deep NLF. It provides strong volumetric power and good stability once placed. As a deep filler, it offers substantial projection and is valued by clinicians for its consistency and reliable performance, often serving as a cost-effective alternative to premium Western brands without compromising on HA quality. It delivers a smooth result when injected deeply and typically lasts 8 to 12 months.
Review: Revolax Deep
Revolax Deep is a dense, highly cross-linked HA filler known for its high viscosity and long duration, sometimes extending up to 18 months. It is classified as a “Deep” filler, making it suitable for pronounced NLF and structural contouring. Its thick, monodensified structure offers significant resistance to degradation, making it highly effective at providing a strong, sustained lift in the deep dermis and subcutaneous tissue. It is a very robust filler often used when maximum volume and longevity from an HA product are desired.
Review: BeuFiller (Mid)
BeuFiller (often the “Mid” or equivalent concentration) is recognized for its exceptional purity and ease of use, providing a soft yet stable gel. It is an excellent middle-ground filler, ideal for moderate NLF where the primary goal is soft, diffuse plumping without excessive structural lifting. Its consistency allows for excellent tissue integration and spreadability, resulting in a very natural, discreet correction that blends smoothly into the surrounding skin. It is often chosen for patients who require natural smoothing of the fold rather than forceful volumetric correction.
Conclusion: Strategic Filling for Optimal NLF Results
Optimal NLF correction is often achieved through a layered approach:
- For Structural Lift (deep correction): Use Radiesse or Juvederm Voluma to lift the entire mid-face/cheek area.
- For Dynamic Correction (movement): Use Restylane Defyne or Refyne for the fold itself.
- For Volumetric Correction (direct fill): Use Revolax Deep or Neuramis Deep directly into the deeper crease.
Professional Advice: The best filler is always the one that is correctly placed. Consult an experienced injector, as technique and precise product placement (deep vs. superficial) are paramount for safe and natural results in the nasolabial area.
🏆 Final Verdict: Choosing the Filler Based on Need
Based on the properties of lifting, dynamism, and longevity, the “best” filler depends entirely on the patient’s anatomy and the specific treatment goal. Recommendations by Category: Choice for Maximum Lift and Longevity (Deep NLF/Mid-Face Collapse): Radiesse (CaHA): The winner for patients needing long-lasting structural correction and collagen stimulation. Juvederm Voluma: Ideal if a dissolvable HA filler with maximum G-prime is preferred for indirect cheek lift. Choice for a Natural and Dynamic Look (Smile Lines): Restylane Defyne/Refyne: The best choice for treating the fold itself, as it perfectly adapts to facial expressions without appearing rigid or “puffy.” Choice for Reliable and Cost-Effective Volume (Moderate Folds): Revolax Deep or Neuramis Deep: Offer an excellent combination of volume, cohesivity, and duration, representing valid alternatives to premium brands for direct fold filling. Key Takeaway: Success in NLF correction often comes from the strategic combination of a structural lifting agent (Radiesse or Voluma) injected deeply, coupled with a dynamic, soft filler (Restylane) to refine superficial lines.
